Description
Android, 6.1″, 16 MP, 157g, IP 68 Water Proof, 2019
Samsung Galaxy S10 128GB Dual SIM properties
| Product name | Galaxy S10 128GB Dual SIM |
| Series | Samsung Galaxy, Samsung Galaxy S |
| Operating System | Android |
| Android Version | 9.0 Android Pie |
| Release Year | 2019 |
| Colour | Black, Blue, Green, Pink, White, Yellow |
| Material (Body) | Aluminum, Glass |
| Senior Phone | No |
| Features | ANT+, Built-in Stereo Speakers |
| Built-in Sensors | Barometer, Face Scanner, Fingerprint Reader, Gyroscope/Accelerometer, Heart Rate Monitor, Proximity Scanner |
| Physical Keyboard | No |
| Home Button | Software Button |
| Fingerprint Reader | Display |
| Water Resistant | Yes |
| IP-Class | IP 68 |
| Shock Resistant | No |
| SIM Card | Nano-SIM |
| Dual SIM Card Slots | Yes |
| Hybrid Dual SIM Slot | Yes |
| GPS | Yes |
| Positioning System | A-GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, GPS, Galileo |
| Communication Standards | 2G, 3G, 4G LTE, Bluetooth, NFC, Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth Codec | aptX |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 (802.11b), Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) |
| 4G Speed (Mbit/s) | Cat20/13: 2000/150 |
| SAR-Value | 1.59 W/kg |
| Built-in Camera | Yes |
| Front Camera | Yes |
| Number of Back Cameras | 3 |
| Number of Front Cameras | 1 |
| Camera Resolution | 16.0 MP |
| Camera Resolution (Front) | 10.0 MP |
| Max Frames Per Second | 960 fps |
| Max Video Resolution | 2160p (4K) |
| Max Aperture | 2.4 |
| Camera Features | Auto Focus, Flash/Light, Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) |
| USB | Yes |
| USB Type | USB (Type C) |
| USB Version | 3.0/3.1 (Gen 1) |
| USB On-The-Go | Yes |
| Headphone Jack 3,5mm | Yes |
| Processor Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Processor Cores | Octa Core |
| System on Chip (SoC) | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
| Graphics Processor (GPU) | ARM Mali-G76 |
| RAM | 8 GB |
| Screen Size | 6.1 “ |
| Screen Resolution | 1440×3040 |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 550 |
| Screen-to-body Ratio | 88.3 % |
| Screen Type | AMOLED |
| Secondary Screen | No |
| Touch Screen | Yes |
| Active Digitizer | No |
| HDR | Yes |
| Battery Capacity (mAh) | 3400 mAh |
| Exchangeable Battery | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes |
| Wireless Charging Standard | PMA, QI |
| Fast Charging | Yes |
| Internal Memory Size | 128 GB |
| Memory Card Reader | Yes |
| Memory Card Type | microSD |
| Max. Memory Card Size | 512GB |
| Height | 149.9 mm |
| Width | 70.4 mm |
| Depth | 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 157.0 g |
BigGuy –
I have had the equipment for exactly a week. Before that, I had S7edge for 4 years, which I was very happy with. The first comparison: the battery of the old model lasts the same as this new one, I was expecting a bit more. Second thing: visually, this new one is obviously super but less distinctive. In addition, the S7 is 5.8 whole and this 6.1, however, the size of the entire phone does not differ at all. As for the phone itself, it is for 2 sim cards, although with this configuration you will not insert a memory card. It has great speakers, which surprised me positively, a bit better screen when it comes to colors. The phone works smoothly. To sum up: expensive toy, you can’t fault it, but earlier models are already much cheaper and the differences will only play a role for very demanding users.
Bro –
I have had the equipment for exactly 5 days and before I had S7edge for 3.5 years, from which I was very happy and here the first battery comparison this old keeps the background the same as the new one, I was expecting a bit more, but it could spin, the second thing visually is the new one of course great but less characteristic than the s7 which lying front immediately betrayed its model, this in turn can be determined by the camera. In addition, the S7 is 5.8 whole and this 6.1, however, the size of the entire phone does not differ at all. As for the phone itself, it is on a 2k SIM card although with this configuration you will not insert a memory card. It has great speakers, which surprised me positively, a bit better screen when it comes to colors. The phone works smoothly and responds to touch without mistake but it is rather obvious. To sum up this expensive toy, you can’t fault it but the earlier models are already much cheaper and the differences will only play a role for very demanding users