Description
The Nokia 225 Dual SIM is a budget-friendly feature phone that was released by HMD Global, a Finnish mobile phone company, in May 2020. This mobile phone is designed for people who are looking for a reliable and efficient device that can easily connect them to their friends and family via calls and messaging.
One of the standout features of the Nokia 225 Dual SIM is its long battery life. It comes with a 1150mAh removable battery that can last for up to 25 days on standby mode and up to 6.3 hours of talk time on a single charge. This makes it an ideal device for people who do not have frequent access to charging facilities.
In terms of design, the Nokia 225 Dual SIM is compact and lightweight, weighing just 90 grams. It is available in three attractive colors, including black, blue, and classic red. The phone’s body is made of polycarbonate material, which makes it durable and resistant to scratches and small drops.
The Nokia 225 Dual SIM comes with a 2.8-inch QVGA display with a resolution of 240×320 pixels. It has a physical alphanumeric keypad that is easy to use and navigate. The phone’s interface is simple and intuitive, with a user-friendly menu that makes it easy to access various apps.
In terms of connectivity, the Nokia 225 Dual SIM supports 2G and 3G networks and comes with Bluetooth 5.0, Micro USB 1.1, and a 3.5 mm headphone jack. It also has a built-in FM radio and an MP3 player, which allows users to listen to their favorite music on the go.
The Nokia 225 Dual SIM comes with a 0.3-megapixel VGA camera, which is not the best in terms of picture quality, but it is perfect for capturing quick snaps and videos. The phone’s camera also features a self-timer function and a night mode, which helps improve the picture quality in low-light conditions.
Finally, the Nokia 225 Dual SIM comes with several pre-installed apps, including Facebook, Twitter, and Opera Mini. It also comes with a range of useful features such as a calculator, a calendar, and a flashlight.
Overall, the Nokia 225 Dual SIM is an ideal mobile phone for people who are looking for a reliable, efficient, and affordable device. It has excellent battery life, a durable and attractive design, and a range of useful features that make it a great choice for everyday use.
2.8″, 2 MP, 100.6g, N/A
Nokia 225 Dual SIM properties
Product name | 225 Dual SIM |
Series | Others |
Release Year | N/A |
Senior Phone | No |
Dual SIM Card Slots | Yes |
Hybrid Dual SIM Slot | No |
Communication Standards | Bluetooth |
Number of Back Cameras | 1 |
Camera Resolution | 2.0 MP |
Max Frames Per Second | 25 fps |
USB | Yes |
Screen Size | 2.8 “ |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 142 |
Battery Capacity (mAh) | 1200 mAh |
Memory Card Reader | Yes |
Height | 124.0 mm |
Width | 55.5 mm |
Depth | 10.4 mm |
Weight | 100.6 g |
Lyla Fields –
I purchased the Nokia 225 Dual SIM in January and I have to say, I am quite disappointed with it. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would rate it a 2. As someone who relies heavily on their phone for work and personal communication, I expected more from this device.
One of the major downsides of the Nokia 225 Dual SIM is its 2.8 screen size. It is incredibly small, making it difficult to navigate and read text. This is particularly frustrating when trying to browse the internet or view pictures. Additionally, the 10.4 mm depth of the phone feels a bit bulky in my hand and pocket, especially in comparison to other mobile phones on the market.
In comparison, my friend recently purchased a popular mobile phone, the Samsung Galaxy A51. The screen size on the A51 is much larger, which enhances the overall user experience. Additionally, the depth of the Samsung Galaxy A51 is significantly slimmer, making it more comfortable to hold. These differences really highlight the shortcomings of the Nokia 225 Dual SIM.
As for the delivery of the Nokia 225 Dual SIM to Texas, there were no issues. The phone arrived within the expected timeframe and was well-packaged. The story behind the purchase was rather simple. My old phone had suddenly stopped working and I needed a replacement quickly. I was on a tight budget, so I opted for the Nokia 225 Dual SIM due to its affordable price. However, now I regret not investing a bit more for a better mobile phone.
Overall, I would not recommend the Nokia 225 Dual SIM. Its small screen size and bulky depth are major drawbacks that significantly impact usability. If you are looking for a more enjoyable and efficient mobile phone experience, I suggest exploring other options like the Samsung Galaxy A51 or similar models.
Bentley –
The darkness descends upon us, and the terror of Lyla Fields’ review still lingers in our minds. But fear not, dear reader, for I shall shed light on the abomination that is her opinion.
As we delve into the abyss of her review, we are met with a cacophony of complaints, each one more absurd than the last. The 2.8 inch screen size? A curse upon humanity! How dare Nokia create a phone that dares to challenge the status quo? Is it not better to have a phone that is designed for the masses, rather than catering to the whims of a select few?
And then, we are treated to the horror of her comparison to the Samsung Galaxy A51. The screen size is larger, the depth is slimmer… but what of the price? Ah, yes, the almighty dollar. For in Lyla Fields’ world, it seems that the only thing that matters is whether or not a phone fits within one’s budget.
But I digress, for today’s news has brought us a far greater terror than any phone could ever hope to inspire. Broccoli sold at Walmart has been voluntarily recalled due to listeria concerns. A mere mortal would be shaken by such a revelation, but not we, for we are aware of the true horror that lurks within every vegetable.
And so, let us return to Lyla Fields’ review, and examine it in the cold light of day. For what is her opinion, really, but a shallow, self-serving critique? A phone with a small screen size and bulky depth may indeed be a drawback for some, but is it not also a testament to Nokia’s commitment to simplicity and functionality?
And what of the delivery time? Ah, yes, the phone arrived within the expected timeframe… but at what cost? Did Lyla Fields consider the environmental impact of her impulsive purchase? The waste generated by her discarded old phone? No, for in her world, only the present moment matters.
In conclusion, I must ask: what is the true horror that lies within Lyla Fields’ review? Is it not a reflection of our own society’s values? A society that prioritizes convenience and affordability above all else, without stopping to consider the consequences?
Beware, dear reader, for in this world of ours, terror lurks around every corner… and even in the most seemingly innocuous reviews.